Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8 features a refined design and improved performance, but its multitasking tools still lag behind rivals, raising questions about its ability to replace laptops for productivity-focused users.
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8 arrives with a stronger case than its predecessors as a premium foldable built for serious use. Reviewers from Tom’s Guide, Android Central and Digital Camera World all point to a more refined design, brighter displays and strong Snapdragon-powered performance, while Samsung’s own software polish remains one of the phone’s main strengths. Yet the device still exposes a familiar weakness: its multitasking tools are good, but not good enough to match the hardware.
That gap matters because foldables are increasingly being sold as laptop alternatives. The Z Fold 8 can run multiple apps at once, and Samsung has improved its layout options with three-app splits, adjustable ratios and more pop-up windows. But as Android Authority argues, these tools still feel less intuitive than the best systems on rival devices, especially when compared with OPPO’s windowing approach, which makes resizing, hiding and recalling apps far cleaner.
Samsung’s wider cover screen gives the standard Z Fold 8 a practical advantage for split-screen work, and SamMobile says that aspect ratio makes three-app use more comfortable than on the Ultra model. The problem is not a lack of capability so much as a lack of clarity and flexibility. The best foldable multitasking systems now let users move quickly between fixed layouts and free-form windows, while Samsung’s version still feels more constrained and less discoverable than it should.
That leaves a curious mismatch in Samsung’s foldable strategy. The regular Z Fold 8 is aimed at mainstream buyers who may not care about heavy multitasking, but the Ultra model is explicitly pitched as a productivity device. In that context, Android Authority’s criticism lands harder: Samsung has built a foldable with excellent screens, strong performance and mature software, yet it has not fully closed a weakness that competitors have already addressed. For buyers who want a phone that can genuinely replace some laptop tasks, that omission still matters.
Disclaimer: This content is intended for informational purposes only. Readers are advised to exercise their own judgement, conduct due diligence, or consult a qualified expert before acting on any information provided.
