The US Federal Communications Commission has restricted imports of foreign-made humanoid robots, citing national security concerns and aiming to curb China’s dominant position in the industry, signalling a new phase in technological and geopolitical tensions.
The United States has moved to block imports of foreign-made humanoid robots, a step framed by regulators as a national security measure but widely read as part of Washington’s broader effort to slow China’s advance in advanced hardware. According to reports from The Guardian, The Washington Post and UPI, the Federal Communications Commission has widened its restrictions to cover robotic devices capable of navigation, environmental sensing and internet connectivity, signalling that the issue now sits at the intersection of artificial intelligence, data collection and industrial policy. (docs.fcc.gov)
Officials argue that the risk is not limited to physical machines entering the country. The FCC has said such devices could gather location data, other personal information and operational details that hostile actors might exploit for surveillance, remote control or access to sensitive systems. The agency’s concern extends to critical infrastructure and to products that could be used for both civilian and military purposes, a theme echoed in coverage by The Guardian and the Washington Post. (docs.fcc.gov)
The move is also unmistakably aimed at China, which according to Barclays and other industry estimates produced about 85% of the world’s humanoid robots last year. The same reports note that Chinese companies are already dominant in volume, while Omdia said China had six firms among the world’s 10 largest robot makers and shipped almost 11,600 humanoid robots last year, compared with only a few hundred from US groups. (apps.fcc.gov)
That imbalance explains why analysts see the ban as a temporary shield for American groups such as Figure AI, Tesla’s Optimus programme and Agility Robotics. The argument in Washington is that US firms still lead in the software layer that gives robots their “brain”, while China has the edge in cheaper mass production and in the actuators, or mechanical muscles, that make movement more advanced. Bank of America estimated in March that annual shipments could reach about 90,000 units by the end of the year, but the market remains early and commercially unproven. (enterpriseefiling.fcc.gov)
Critics say the policy could also slow US progress by cutting off access to inexpensive Chinese hardware used for testing new AI systems. One industry consultant, Georg Stiller, argued on X that restrictions may reduce risk without creating a competitive domestic ecosystem, while Rash Doshi of the Council on Foreign Relations described the measure as one of the strongest forms of support yet for the US robotics sector. China, for its part, has condemned the curbs as protectionism and warned of countermeasures, including tighter limits on materials and market access. (enterpriseefiling.fcc.gov)
The commercial prize is potentially large. Barclays estimates the humanoid robot market, now worth about $2 billion to $3 billion, could reach $200 billion by 2035 if artificial intelligence, mobility and battery technology improve enough to support wider use. Elon Musk has made far bolder claims, saying Tesla’s Optimus could become “the biggest product ever” and eventually sell for as little as $20,000 to $30,000 each if produced at scale. For now, the likeliest first uses remain factories and warehouses, where robots can take on repetitive and physically demanding work before moving into care, logistics and household tasks. (enterpriseefiling.fcc.gov)
Disclaimer: This content is intended for informational purposes only. Readers are advised to exercise their own judgement, conduct due diligence, or consult a qualified expert before acting on any information provided.
